I do a fair bit of reading on Associated Content and Examiner, as I write for both websites. Both websites are unfortunately where anyone can write anything they want. Sounds like a good thing right? Wrong.
As a professional travel writer, who has actually BEEN to all the places I write about, I find it annoying that AC and Examiner allow writers to write 'travel pieces' about places they've never been to. These 'writers' simply find a couple of articles about a place, rewrite it in their own words, don't have their own photos because they've never BEEN there and then publish it. Should be stopped, IMO.
I've always been annoyed but just got off reading an AC article by a 'travel writer' who, I could tell from her 20-plus published pieces, hasn't been to any of the places she's writing about. In her article, she spouted off about why Rio de Janeiro isn't appropriate for the Olympic Games because it's 'dangerous and gang-infested'. With vocabulary like that, she's obviously watching too much American TV :-)
So, come on Associated Content and Examiner, stop allowing anyone to just shove up regurgitated crap about places they've never traveled to. It's lying and it's also bringing down the reputation of the websites. I mean, who's going to take any article seriously that's published on a website where anyone can decide they're a 'writer' and throw up articles on subjects they know nothing about.



































Recent Comments